François Ecalle was furious. The Auditor-General’s Court, at its discretion, created the Fipeco (Public Finance and Economy) agency, which produces a wide range of government accounts, compulsory deductions or local funds. A very useful, accurate, written, highly commended work by experts and journalists who allow us to understand government information or objections against budget issues. François Ecalle appealed to the General Directorate of Public Finances (Dgfip) for the benefit, as do many. thinking tanks, reducing corporate income tax. Dgfip’s answer fell: no.
It considers that the activities of the Fipeco corporation do not represent “education and science”. Shooting is a challenge for François Ecalle. The cost of about 30,000 euros a year is paid by two-thirds and its contributions. Members of the board have repeatedly considered the situation (recruiting a student, researcher for further study, conference organization, etc.), but this has been impossible due to limited funding.
Bercy feels that the alliance has no scientific background
Above all, this denial seems pointless and pointless. In addition François Ecalle had no legal obligation to request “rescript” from
Dgfip, most organizations use non-tax deduction for donations (66% of donations) without permission. “We wanted to be good students, law-abiding citizens, which annoys the judge of the Auditors’ Court. And we are punished compared to most thinkers who benefit from this opportunity without consulting the supervisors.”
Above all, negative arguments raise questions. First, Bercy argues that Fipeco has no “scientific character”. “There has to be a real process of research and reflection whose purpose is to provide new insights beyond simple analysis, integration and exchange of ideas.”, shows the tax administration. Then, he hates the lack of a “trained person” in the group’s work. “The mere availability of public resources that allow the dissemination of information such as a book, magazine or information page in itself would not be sufficient to reflect academic performance within the meaning of tax law,” he said. remembered Bercy. In this regard, Fipeco provides people with information on public finances and finances, analysis and documentation by their president. It does not immediately confirm the spread of knowledge. “
Dgfip’s supporters love the agency’s publications
Two very controversial arguments. Fipeco’s publications are no less “scientific” than those of other think tanks, such as the Ifrap or Concorde Foundation, which allow donors to benefit from tax exemptions for their contributions. True, this work is being carried out by one expert, François Ecalle, but it is also counted by about twenty state financial experts (financial experts, judges of the Auditors Court, etc.), who are the editors.
Ditto for educational purpose. Fipeco’s technical publications are used by many students and adults. “Fipeco’s files and documents are heavily used by Dgfip’s assistants who, at no cost, enrich their education and prepare for competitive exams by gaining experience,” explains François Ecalle, who is seen as ungrateful. He receives a bill from the supervisors whose sponsors benefit from his work.
The authority of good thinkers is lacking
Following Fipeco’s case, the case shows opposition to the weaknesses of the social media system and the rationalist, which is increasingly common during the election. These players can take advantage of unsolicited tax returns at Dgfip, just as the President of Fipeco did. “Although the issuance of unlicensed tax receipts is special in France, checks made by tax authorities are rare.”, reported the Auditors Court in the December 2020 report.
Obviously, its operation is dangerous by those who request it but do not monitor many “mind boxes”. Mu his ticket, published Thursday, November 25 under the heading, François Ecalle doubted the Directorate General of Public Finance’s approval to oversee the session. Judging whether the events are academic and scientific and overseeing “organizations that provide religious or religious information in violation of Republican principles”, as the Auditors Court ruled. With thought tanks, as in other areas, the Government incorporates all of the norms, which Fipeco has paid for, as well as the failure to regulate.
Original Article reposted fromSource link
Disclaimer: The website autopost contents from credible news sources and we are not the original creators. If we Have added some content that belongs to you or your organization by mistake, We are sorry for that. We apologize for that and assure you that this won’t be repeated in future. If you are the rightful owner of the content used in our Website, please mail us with your Name, Organization Name, Contact Details, Copyright infringing URL and Copyright Proof (URL or Legal Document) aT spacksdigital @ gmail.com
I assure you that, I will remove the infringing content Within 48 Hours.